Security and TrustIndex
Security and trust on this platform rests on one idea: every component holds a verified, scoped credential it must present to act — not an inherited grant of trust. That discipline shows up across five areas: who's known to the system and what they're allowed to do, how a reader independently verifies a record hasn't been altered, what contains a compromise once one occurs, how data is handled and kept private, and the controls that keep code honest from a contributor's machine to production.
A diligence reader's real question is can this be trusted? An engineer's is usually narrower — how does capability-based access control actually work? Both start below.
Start here: Capability-based security — the access-control model the whole category is named for: components hold verified cryptographic tokens instead of ambient privilege. One software layer implements it today; kernel-level enforcement is planned.
Identity and permissions
Who is known to the system, how a device proves it, and what it's allowed to do.
- Capability-based security — the access-control model: components hold verified cryptographic tokens instead of ambient privilege
- Machine-based authorization — pairing hardware to hardware replaces passwords; the pairing itself is the permission
- Personnel and permissions — how contributor identity and the four permission tiers are expressed through pairings, not database roles
- Identity ledger schema design — the Person/Anchor/Claim record types behind Ring 1 identity resolution
- Verification surveyor — the human-in-the-loop checkpoint that confirms an extracted identity before it's committed
Cryptographic verification
How a reader independently checks that a record hasn't been altered.
- Cryptographic payload attestation — client-side SHA-256 hashing that would let any viewer verify published content wasn't changed in transit; today it's an unwired, cosmetic pattern in a few templates, not a capability any shipped surface actually offers
- Cryptographic ledgers — the immutable-state storage pattern: hash-chained entries, signed checkpoints, monthly Sigstore Rekor anchoring
Isolation boundaries
What contains a compromise once one occurs. Thin relative to the category's own scope — see the tenant isolation and VM tenant articles in Where It Runs for the commercially load-bearing case, which isn't yet cross-referenced from here.
- seL4 capability topology — why security in an seL4 system is the shape of the capability graph, not a policy layer
- Diode standard — the unidirectional authority-to-subject command flow that removes lateral movement by design
- Genesis protocol — the fleet-bootstrapping sequence a node runs at first boot to reach a secure, claimable state
Data handling and privacy
- Data sovereignty and zero-state telemetry — the platform's only article on this clause today; retention, deletion, and encryption-at-rest have no dedicated article yet
Supply-chain controls
Keeping code honest from a contributor's machine to production.
- Five-stage supply chain — the contributor-to-customer promotion path, gated by a heavily guarded promotion script rather than a pull request, and the double-blind air-gap between contributor and customer
- Pre-commit defense in depth — the helper-only gate, secret-pattern scan, and size guard that run on every commit
What this is not
This page is not a substitute for reading the linked articles — each group's one-line annotation orients, it doesn't replace the underlying mechanism's own caveats and "what this is not" section. It is not exhaustive of every security-relevant fact in this wiki: isolation boundaries in particular are thin here because the commercially load-bearing tenant-isolation work lives in Where It Runs, not this category. It is not a compliance attestation — several linked articles describe planned, not-yet-built mechanisms, hedged accordingly in their own text.
See also
- Architecture — how the platform is put together
- Governance and Standards — what was decided and why it is compliant
- Where It Runs — the deployed storage and ledger infrastructure these mechanisms protect