Skip to content

PointSav Documentation

The engineering library for the PointSav platform — operating systems and services for regulated businesses that own their data, their AI, and their record-keeping outright. Where the monorepo holds the code, this wiki holds the reasoning: architecture, services, security, and the governance commitments that bind future development.

Nightly DataGraph rebuild

The nightly datagraph rebuild is the scheduled pipeline that reconstructs the platform's full knowledge graph from its canonical flat-file sources. Every graph-queryable relationship — entity links, extraction outputs, ledger entries, and location intelligence indexes — is derived from the same deterministic inputs each cycle. The result is a fresh, stable snapshot available to all query consumers at the start of each operating day.

Key Takeaways

  • The graph is rebuilt from flat-file sources nightly, not maintained by continuous mutation. Consumers read a stable snapshot, not a live partially-constructed graph.
  • Every rebuild cycle can be replicated from archived flat files, since the WORM ledger snapshot each cycle reads from is itself immutable.
  • Entity extraction uses grammar-constrained inference through the Doorman — this is Ring 2 calling Ring 3 for a proposal, not a Ring 2-internal deterministic step. A capture-then-promote checkpoint exists for exactly this case — extraction output can be held for a human-reviewed, cryptographically-signed approval before it becomes a graph write, matching the SYS-ADR-07 boundary. That checkpoint is opt-in, not the default: an operator must explicitly enable it. Left at its default setting, extraction output writes to the graph immediately with no per-item review. See the Three-Ring Architecture for the general rule this checkpoint implements when enabled.
  • Each cycle compounds the prior cycle. Newly committed records extend the graph; no record is removed. The Compounding substrate mechanism means the graph grows monotonically accurate over time.

Purpose

The rebuild pattern ensures that the queryable substrate reflects the committed state of the canonical record, not accumulated in-memory drift. Any single run can be replicated from the archived flat files.

Schema-driven joins against the canonical taxonomy and location intelligence indexes are deterministic — no fuzzy matching. Entity extraction itself is not: it is grammar-constrained inference through the Doorman, producing a structured record. Whether a human reviews that record before it becomes a graph write depends on a setting an operator controls, off by default — see the compliance note above. This is a real, currently-open gap between the SYS-ADR-07 boundary's intent (AI never writes to a structured record store directly) and this pipeline's default configuration, tracked separately as an open remediation item.

Pipeline stages

The rebuild pipeline follows a fixed sequence:

  1. Ledger snapshot — reads the current committed state of all WORM ledger segments. The ledger is append-only; the snapshot is the complete history as of the scheduled start time.
  2. Extraction passservice-extraction hands corpus text to service-content, which calls the Doorman for grammar-constrained entity extraction, producing structured entity records for persons, organisations, assets, and events. This is a Ring 2 → Ring 3 call, not a deterministic step — whether these records land as a human-reviewable pending item or write straight to the graph depends on the operator setting described above.
  3. Schema-driven joins — entity records are joined against the canonical taxonomy and location intelligence indexes using explicit foreign-key relationships. No fuzzy matching at this stage.
  4. Graph construction — joined records are assembled into the queryable graph substrate consumed by service-content and the Doorman inference layer.
  5. Swap — the completed graph replaces the prior snapshot atomically. Query consumers switch to the new version at the next request after the swap.

Position in the substrate stack

The nightly rebuild sits between the WORM ledger (which accumulates append-only writes during the day) and the query-serving tier (which reads the most recently completed graph). Consumers of the knowledge graph always read a stable snapshot, not a partially-constructed graph.

The Compounding substrate mechanism means each rebuild cycle inherits the full prior graph, then adds newly committed records on top. Accuracy compounds over time: an entity that appeared in three ledger records two years ago and twelve ledger records last month has a richer graph node than a newly registered entity — without any manual curation step.

See also

Cite this record: /wiki/nightly-datagraph-rebuild — revision 7ff56dd5, last updated 24 August 2026.

Important Information

Corporate structure. PointSav Digital Systems ("PointSav") is currently a trade name of Woodfine Capital Projects Inc. ("Woodfine"), planned to become a wholly-owned Woodfine subsidiary upon incorporation. PointSav does not itself offer, sell, or solicit any security. Any securities offering associated with Woodfine's real-property direct-hold solutions is made exclusively by Woodfine, and only by means of the applicable Private Placement Memorandum.

No investment advice. This wiki's content is provided for engineering, operational, research, and development purposes. Nothing on this wiki constitutes investment advice or a solicitation to invest in any Woodfine partnership or direct-hold solution.

Intellectual property. The PointSav name, trade name, wordmark, and marks, together with all current and future PointSav- and Totebox-branded products, services, and offerings — and the software, source code, documentation, design system, and all related materials — are proprietary to Woodfine and its affiliates, except for components identified as open source. No rights are granted except as expressly set out in a written license or agreement. The full trademark notice appears in the footer of every page on this site.

Open source components. Portions of the platform are made available under permissive open-source licenses identified in the accompanying repository. Use of those components is governed by their respective license terms.

No warranty; informational use. Content on this wiki is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute a representation, warranty, or commitment with respect to product functionality, availability, pricing, or roadmap. Some articles describe planned or intended features, capabilities, and milestones — language such as "planned," "intended," "targeted," "may," and "expected" marks this forward-looking content, which is subject to change and does not constitute a commitment regarding future performance.

Confidentiality. Where an article describes an operational or deployment detail that is not intended for public disclosure, that article is not published on this wiki. Content here is general-purpose engineering documentation, not customer-specific configuration.

Jurisdiction. Woodfine Capital Projects Inc. is organized in British Columbia, Canada. References to the Sovereign Data Foundation on this wiki describe a planned or intended initiative only, not a current equity holder or active governance body.

Changes to this notice. PointSav may update this notice from time to time; the version posted on this page governs.

Not a filing system. This wiki is not a securities filing system, an electronic disclosure repository, or a substitute for SEDAR+ or any other regulatory filing system. Formal securities filings are made through the applicable regulatory filing system, not through this wiki.

Full disclaimer. This notice supplements, and does not replace, the full Disclaimers article. In the event of any conflict, the full Disclaimers article governs.

Read the full disclaimer →