Skip to content
Historical revision — this record as it stood on 15 May 2026, not the current version. View the current record →

Single-Boundary Compute Discipline

The Single-Boundary Compute Discipline is the structural rule that all AI inference traffic in a Foundry deployment passes through one and only one boundary point: the Doorman (service-slm). No process, session, or service reaches an inference tier — local, GPU burst, or external API — except through this boundary.

The discipline encodes Doctrine claim #43. It is not a preferred-path routing convention that allows bypass by configuration; it is enforced at the kernel and secret boundaries so that no other process on the system can reach inference compute.

Why one boundary

A single boundary makes four properties structurally guaranteed rather than policy-dependent:

Audit completeness. The audit ledger records every inference call. An operator asking "did AI touch this record?" inspects the ledger and receives a definitive answer. If bypass were possible, the ledger would have gaps — and a gapped ledger is inadmissible as a compliance record.

Corpus completeness. The apprenticeship substrate captures every Doorman-mediated call as a training tuple. Bypass produces no shadow brief. The training corpus has gaps, and those gaps permanently degrade the quality of the per-tenant adapter that accumulates from the corpus.

Cost control. Budget caps and kill-switches operate at the Doorman boundary. Bypass routes around the cap. A deployment with a monthly inference budget has no enforceable budget if bypass is possible.

Sovereignty. API keys for external providers and the bearer token for GPU burst capacity live exclusively in the Doorman's environment. No other process holds these credentials. When a key is rotated or revoked, the change happens in one place.

Four enforcement mechanisms

The single-boundary discipline is structural, not policy:

Bearer-only-in-Doorman. All inference credentials — the GPU burst bearer token and all external provider API keys — exist only in the Doorman's environment file. No cluster session has read access to them. Without credentials, a bypass attempt fails at the authentication layer.

Firewall. The GPU burst instance accepts inbound connections only from the Doorman's host IP. External API provider endpoints have rate limits and audit visibility only at the Doorman. Network-level enforcement is a second structural layer.

UID-owner iptables on the local tier. The local inference server binds to a loopback address and accepts connections only from the Doorman process UID, enforced via iptables on the kernel output chain. Any other process on the same machine attempting a direct connection is dropped at the kernel boundary.

Startup verification. On boot, the Doorman verifies that its GPU burst bearer token is present when a burst endpoint is configured, and refuses to start with an unset bearer. Misconfiguration cannot accidentally allow burst traffic to flow without audit.

What callers send

The Doorman exposes a standard OpenAI-compatible HTTP interface. Callers — whether a task session, the operator TUI, or a customer-built agent — send requests to the Doorman's local binding. The Doorman selects the appropriate compute tier, assembles graph-grounded context (see knowledge-graph-grounded-apprenticeship), routes the request, records the audit entry, and returns the response.

This interface is also the MCP gateway endpoint (see mcp-substrate-protocol). There is no separate path for MCP clients.

Relationship to the three-ring architecture

The Doorman is the entry point to Ring 3. The three-ring-architecture makes Ring 3 structurally optional — a deployment may operate without AI inference entirely and the deterministic Ring 1 and Ring 2 services remain fully functional. The single-boundary discipline is what makes that optionality safe: because all inference passes through one point, disabling that point produces a clean degraded state rather than a partially-bypassed one.

Composition

This discipline composes with several other Doctrine claims. The Knowledge-Graph-Grounded Apprenticeship (claim #44) depends on it: graph context is assembled at the Doorman before dispatch; bypass means ungrounded inference. The MCP-as-Substrate-Protocol (claim #46) designates the Doorman as the MCP gateway; bypass breaks the MCP graph. The Two-Bottoms Sovereign Substrate (claim #34) enforces customer sovereignty at the Doorman boundary; bypass is a sovereignty leak.

See also

Important Information

Important Information

Corporate structure. PointSav Digital Systems ("PointSav") is a trade name of Woodfine Capital Projects Inc. ("Woodfine"). PointSav does not itself offer, sell, or solicit any security. Any securities offering associated with Woodfine's real-property direct-hold solutions is made exclusively by Woodfine, and only by means of the applicable Private Placement Memorandum.

No investment advice. This wiki's content is provided for engineering, operational, research, and development purposes. Nothing on this wiki constitutes investment advice or a solicitation to invest in any Woodfine partnership or direct-hold solution.

Intellectual property. The PointSav name, trade name, wordmark, and marks, together with all current and future PointSav- and Totebox-branded products, services, and offerings — and the software, source code, documentation, design system, and all related materials — are proprietary to Woodfine and its affiliates, except for components identified as open source. No rights are granted except as expressly set out in a written license or agreement. See TRADEMARK.md in this repository for the full trademark notice.

Open source components. Portions of the platform are made available under permissive open-source licenses identified in the accompanying repository. Use of those components is governed by their respective license terms.

No warranty; informational use. Content on this wiki is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute a representation, warranty, or commitment with respect to product functionality, availability, pricing, or roadmap. Some articles describe planned or intended features, capabilities, and milestones — language such as "planned," "intended," "targeted," "may," and "expected" marks this forward-looking content, which is subject to change and does not constitute a commitment regarding future performance.

Confidentiality. Where an article describes an operational or deployment detail that is not intended for public disclosure, that article is not published on this wiki. Content here is general-purpose engineering documentation, not customer-specific configuration.

Jurisdiction. Woodfine Capital Projects Inc. is organized in British Columbia, Canada. References to the Sovereign Data Foundation on this wiki describe a planned or intended initiative only, not a current equity holder or active governance body.

Changes to this notice. PointSav may update this notice from time to time; the version posted on this page governs.

Not a filing system. This wiki is not a securities filing system, an electronic disclosure repository, or a substitute for SEDAR+ or any other regulatory filing system. Formal securities filings are made through the applicable regulatory filing system, not through this wiki.

Full disclaimer. This notice supplements, and does not replace, the full Disclaimers article. In the event of any conflict, the full Disclaimers article governs.

Read the full disclaimer →