Skip to content

PointSav Documentation

The engineering library for the PointSav platform — operating systems and services for regulated businesses that own their data, their AI, and their record-keeping outright. Where the monorepo holds the code, this wiki holds the reasoning: architecture, services, security, and the governance commitments that bind future development.

Historical revision — this record as it stood on 7 September 2026, not the current version. View the current record →

Close out a construction project

Prerequisites

  • Everything in Monitor an active construction project's prerequisites.
  • The ongoing-monitoring reports (particularly cost-to-complete and change-order exposure) generated at least once — the job-completion pack cites their figures directly rather than recomputing them.

Purpose

Produce the two reports a project manager or operations lead uses when a project is approaching completion: a weighted operational scorecard across six categories, and a job-completion checklist and review pack. Neither report requires the project to actually be finished to run — both are designed to be usable as a live status check throughout the project, and both say so honestly if the project is still under construction.

Procedure

1. Point both binaries at the project's data directory

export TCO26_DATA_DIR=/data/construction/example-project

2. Run the operational scorecard

cargo run --bin ksf_evidence -p tool-construction-tco-26

This renders a full weighted scorecard — six categories (safety, quality, client relationships, cost control, schedule, documentation), each with its own set of real questions and point weightings. A small number of questions in the safety category are automatically evidenced from the safety-activity register covered in Monitor an active construction project — for example, whether a required monthly submission exists on file for a given period is a fact the register can confirm mechanically. Every other question — which is most of them — is explicitly marked as requiring human review. No question is ever auto-scored based on a judgment call this engine has no way to observe.

3. Run the job-completion pack

cargo run --bin job_closeout -p tool-construction-tco-26

This renders a full job-completion checklist (dozens of real close-out items — final inspections, warranty documentation, key handover, and similar) and a structured project-review template. A small number of checklist items that map onto figures the engine already computes — a final cost projection, a summary of change-order exposure — cite those figures directly from the reports covered in Monitor an active construction project, each one explicitly labeled as a current, in-progress snapshot rather than a final number. Every other item is a plain fill-in template, since most close-out actions (returning keys, cancelling insurance, obtaining a utility-transfer confirmation) are physical-world actions this engine has no way to observe.

Expected outcome

Two files each, ksf_evidence.{html,pdf} and job_closeout.{html,pdf}, written to <data-dir>/outputs/<year>/.

Verification

  • Neither report ever claims the project is complete on its own authority. If you run these against a project that is still under construction, both reports say so plainly — the job-completion pack in particular states outright, in its own basis-of-preparation note, that it is rendering against an in-progress project. If a report you generate reads as though it's asserting completion, that's a defect worth reporting, not an expected outcome.
  • Open both PDFs and confirm every cited figure is labeled as a snapshot, not a final number, wherever a checklist item or scorecard question cites another report's data.
  • Re-run Monitor an active construction project's dashboard afterward to confirm both new files appear under the "Job Completion" section.

What this task does not do

  • It does not score judgment questions. The overwhelming majority of the scorecard's questions, and several close-out checklist items, require a human reviewer's own assessment. Nothing in either report attempts to answer them.
  • It does not compute a final cost or a final change-order figure. Both reports cite the current, in-progress figures from the ongoing-monitoring reports — running this task does not itself close the books on a project.
  • It does not require the project to be finished. Both binaries run against any project state, at any point — there is no "the project isn't done yet" error condition.

Edge cases

  • A project with no real data behind the reports it cites still renders a complete report — every checklist item and scorecard question is present, with the citation fields showing an honest "unmeasured" state rather than being omitted.

Rollback

Nothing to undo — both binaries read existing files and write only into <data-dir>/outputs/<year>/.

Next steps

See also

Important Information

Corporate structure. PointSav Digital Systems ("PointSav") is currently a trade name of Woodfine Capital Projects Inc. ("Woodfine"), planned to become a wholly-owned Woodfine subsidiary upon incorporation. PointSav does not itself offer, sell, or solicit any security. Any securities offering associated with Woodfine's real-property direct-hold solutions is made exclusively by Woodfine, and only by means of the applicable Private Placement Memorandum.

No investment advice. This wiki's content is provided for engineering, operational, research, and development purposes. Nothing on this wiki constitutes investment advice or a solicitation to invest in any Woodfine partnership or direct-hold solution.

Intellectual property. The PointSav name, trade name, wordmark, and marks, together with all current and future PointSav- and Totebox-branded products, services, and offerings — and the software, source code, documentation, design system, and all related materials — are proprietary to Woodfine and its affiliates, except for components identified as open source. No rights are granted except as expressly set out in a written license or agreement. The full trademark notice appears in the footer of every page on this site.

Open source components. Portions of the platform are made available under permissive open-source licenses identified in the accompanying repository. Use of those components is governed by their respective license terms.

No warranty; informational use. Content on this wiki is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute a representation, warranty, or commitment with respect to product functionality, availability, pricing, or roadmap. Some articles describe planned or intended features, capabilities, and milestones — language such as "planned," "intended," "targeted," "may," and "expected" marks this forward-looking content, which is subject to change and does not constitute a commitment regarding future performance.

Confidentiality. Where an article describes an operational or deployment detail that is not intended for public disclosure, that article is not published on this wiki. Content here is general-purpose engineering documentation, not customer-specific configuration.

Jurisdiction. Woodfine Capital Projects Inc. is organized in British Columbia, Canada. References to the Sovereign Data Foundation on this wiki describe a planned or intended initiative only, not a current equity holder or active governance body.

Changes to this notice. PointSav may update this notice from time to time; the version posted on this page governs.

Not a filing system. This wiki is not a securities filing system, an electronic disclosure repository, or a substitute for SEDAR+ or any other regulatory filing system. Formal securities filings are made through the applicable regulatory filing system, not through this wiki.

Full disclaimer. This notice supplements, and does not replace, the full Disclaimers article. In the event of any conflict, the full Disclaimers article governs.

Read the full disclaimer →