Wiki provider landscape
wikipedia-parity: remove inline copyright, trademark, and Provenance blocks from article bodies
@@ -216,15 +216,3 @@ This audit was conducted 2026-04-30 with web-fetch primary research across all 2 - [[article-shell-leapfrog]] — The article-shell leapfrog primitives that pair with the competitive analysis here. - [[wikipedia-leapfrog-design]] — The design narrative behind the 95%/5% muscle-memory contract. - [[substrate-native-compatibility]] — Why the substrate ships its own surface rather than adapting an existing provider. ## Provenance Authored 2026-04-30 by a project-knowledge Task Claude session (Opus parent synthesis from Sonnet sub-agent C report that conducted web-fetch primary research across all 25 providers). Refined by project-language, 2026-04-30. This TOPIC is structural competitive analysis — its purpose requires naming providers and describing their limitations factually, consistent with workspace `CLAUDE.md` §6 "Structural positioning (no competitive comparison)": each provider is described factually with its strongest positioning and named genuine advantages; PointSav's substrate is framed structurally, not as a "winner" claim. Forward-looking framings follow [ni-51-102] and [osc-sn-51-721] continuous-disclosure posture. Material assumptions: the substrate's governance and editorial preconditions remain on the design trajectory described in Foundry DOCTRINE.md and workspace NEXT.md. --- *Copyright © 2026 Woodfine Capital Projects Inc. Licensed under [Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).* *Woodfine Capital Projects™, Woodfine Management Corp™, PointSav Digital Systems™, Totebox Orchestration™, and Totebox Archive™ are trademarks of Woodfine Capital Projects Inc., used in Canada, the United States, Latin America, and Europe. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.*