Skip to content

Institutional small language model

← All revisions

1c02ec18 · PointSav Digital Systems ·

fix(editorial): strip leaked claim-comment markers (22 files); tier-nomenclature lede rewrite (§16.C Mode 2)

View the full record as of this revision →

@@ -27,9 +27,9 @@ references:

An AI request that leaves the building cannot be audited and cannot be recalled. The moment institutional intent reaches a frontier model in another company's cloud, the organization has surrendered both the record of the decision and control over it.

<!--claim id=small-by-design confidence=structural cites=[]-->`service-slm` is the language-model service of the PointSav family. It is deliberately a Small Language Model — quantised, narrow, fast — and its job is not conversation but semantic translation: turning institutional intent into deterministic outputs.<!--/claim-->
`service-slm` is the language-model service of the PointSav family. It is deliberately a Small Language Model — quantised, narrow, fast — and its job is not conversation but semantic translation: turning institutional intent into deterministic outputs.

<!--claim id=doorman-transit confidence=structural cites=[]-->The service runs in three compute tiers, and every inference call — local, burst, or external — transits the [[doorman-protocol|Doorman]] audit boundary, where each prompt and completion is captured to the per-tenant [[worm-ledger-design|ledger]] before the response returns.<!--/claim-->
The service runs in three compute tiers, and every inference call — local, burst, or external — transits the [[doorman-protocol|Doorman]] audit boundary, where each prompt and completion is captured to the per-tenant [[worm-ledger-design|ledger]] before the response returns.

For a regulated buyer the consequence is concrete. No AI decision is unlogged, and no request reaches a third-party API without crossing a boundary the operator controls. This article covers the four operations, the three compute tiers, the Doorman boundary, and why a small model is a structural choice rather than a cost compromise.

@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ The service is invisible — there is no chat window, and the operator never typ
| Socket assignment | Entity bundle from [[service-extraction]] + [[archetypes-and-chart-of-accounts|Chart of Accounts]] | Sovereign-ID with Chart-of-Accounts socket |
| Theme suggestion | Recurring patterns the Gravity Engine flags | Proposed new entries to the Themes Seed Vault, for operator approval |

<!--claim id=no-autonomous-publish confidence=structural cites=[]-->The model never publishes structured data autonomously. Every output transits a human-in-the-loop verification step before it can be written to a verified ledger.<!--/claim-->
The model never publishes structured data autonomously. Every output transits a human-in-the-loop verification step before it can be written to a verified ledger.

## The three compute tiers

@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ The same `service-slm` interface adapts to the host hardware through three execu
| Elastic burst | Operator-provisioned ephemeral GPU node | Larger model on rented hardware; data tunnelled over an encrypted link | Cost-optimised heavy batch processing; the node is torn down after the run |
| External API | Licensed third-party API endpoint | Frontier model | Last-resort routing for tasks where local capacity is insufficient |

<!--claim id=no-tier-bypass confidence=structural cites=[]-->All three tiers transit the Doorman audit boundary. No tier bypasses it.<!--/claim-->
All three tiers transit the Doorman audit boundary. No tier bypasses it.

## The Doorman boundary

@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ The Doorman exists for three reasons.

## Model selection

<!--claim id=olmo-canonical cites=[olmo3-allenai] confidence=established-->The canonical local model is from the OLMo family, which ships with fully open weights and training-data documentation [^2].<!--/claim--> Open weights and documented training data are a prerequisite for continued pre-training on an operator's own corpus — the long-term path to a domain-specialised institutional model.
The canonical local model is from the OLMo family, which ships with fully open weights and training-data documentation [^2]. Open weights and documented training data are a prerequisite for continued pre-training on an operator's own corpus — the long-term path to a domain-specialised institutional model.

| Profile | Model | RAM target |
|---|---|---|
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ The Doorman exists for three reasons.

## Why a small model

<!--claim id=small-model-rationale confidence=structural cites=[]-->A frontier-scale model imposes three costs `service-slm` cannot accept: it requires cloud egress, it consumes tens of gigabytes of RAM, and it cannot be audited in any meaningful sense. A 1B-parameter quantised model is sufficient for the one narrow task — translating institutional English into deterministic outputs — and fits inside the cost envelope of a low-cost cloud node alongside a Totebox.<!--/claim-->
A frontier-scale model imposes three costs `service-slm` cannot accept: it requires cloud egress, it consumes tens of gigabytes of RAM, and it cannot be audited in any meaningful sense. A 1B-parameter quantised model is sufficient for the one narrow task — translating institutional English into deterministic outputs — and fits inside the cost envelope of a low-cost cloud node alongside a Totebox.

Specialisation, not scale, is the design principle.

Important Information

Important Information

Corporate structure. PointSav Digital Systems ("PointSav") is a trade name of Woodfine Capital Projects Inc. ("Woodfine"). PointSav does not itself offer, sell, or solicit any security. Any securities offering associated with Woodfine's real-property direct-hold solutions is made exclusively by Woodfine, and only by means of the applicable Private Placement Memorandum.

No investment advice. This wiki's content is provided for engineering, operational, research, and development purposes. Nothing on this wiki constitutes investment advice or a solicitation to invest in any Woodfine partnership or direct-hold solution.

Intellectual property. The PointSav name, trade name, wordmark, and marks, together with all current and future PointSav- and Totebox-branded products, services, and offerings — and the software, source code, documentation, design system, and all related materials — are proprietary to Woodfine and its affiliates, except for components identified as open source. No rights are granted except as expressly set out in a written license or agreement. See TRADEMARK.md in this repository for the full trademark notice.

Open source components. Portions of the platform are made available under permissive open-source licenses identified in the accompanying repository. Use of those components is governed by their respective license terms.

No warranty; informational use. Content on this wiki is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute a representation, warranty, or commitment with respect to product functionality, availability, pricing, or roadmap. Some articles describe planned or intended features, capabilities, and milestones — language such as "planned," "intended," "targeted," "may," and "expected" marks this forward-looking content, which is subject to change and does not constitute a commitment regarding future performance.

Confidentiality. Where an article describes an operational or deployment detail that is not intended for public disclosure, that article is not published on this wiki. Content here is general-purpose engineering documentation, not customer-specific configuration.

Jurisdiction. Woodfine Capital Projects Inc. is organized in British Columbia, Canada. References to the Sovereign Data Foundation on this wiki describe a planned or intended initiative only, not a current equity holder or active governance body.

Changes to this notice. PointSav may update this notice from time to time; the version posted on this page governs.

Not a filing system. This wiki is not a securities filing system, an electronic disclosure repository, or a substitute for SEDAR+ or any other regulatory filing system. Formal securities filings are made through the applicable regulatory filing system, not through this wiki.

Full disclaimer. This notice supplements, and does not replace, the full Disclaimers article. In the event of any conflict, the full Disclaimers article governs.

Read the full disclaimer →