Retail co-location tier methodology
6 revisions
Maintained by PointSav Digital Systems. Each revision is content-addressed by its commit hash.
- fix(frontmatter): add short_description to 7 articles missing it
- Track-B documentation wave: substrate category — 32 REWRITE across R0/R1/R2/R8/R10 redactions, Test-1 factual contradictions, DP6 narration removal, and EN/ES parity restoration (largest single-category batch)
- docs(documentation): rename fabricated osc-sn-51-721 citation ID to np-51-201 workspace-wide -- following Command's citations.yaml fix (commit c6be400, real workspace-wide OSC SN 51-721 sweep), this wiki's citation ID and ~59 prose/frontmatter references to the fabricated Ontario-specific staff notice were left dangling; renamed to the real CSA National Policy 51-201 entry Command's fix established, matching the same instrument corporate wiki's dad5b0a fix now cites. Mechanical ID rename + prose phrase swap only, no new claims (EN+ES, 61 files).
- editorial(substrate): fix retail-co-location-tier-methodology gate omissions (Track-B) — confirmed against app-orchestration-gis/SCORING-METHODOLOGY.md: 2 real gates were missing entirely (Tier 1's secondary-catchment-population check, Tier 2's consumer-spend-rank requirement), understating the real gate set; kept the existing appropriate abstraction level (no internal field names, no exact IoU radius/thresholds) rather than adding implementation specifics beyond what a public explainer needs, per public-repo-safety-review.md; register-clean EN+ES
- fix(index-group): backfill index_group across 11 categories migrated to Index Topic (330 files)
- content(gis): GIS/location-intelligence cluster consolidation (final of 5 flagged clusters) — merged the one genuine duplicate (pointsav-gis-engine.md into location-intelligence-substrate.md; its own body said its core logic lives in app-orchestration-gis). More significant: found and fixed a corpus-wide wikilink collision — 7 articles cited [[co-location-methodology]] as the retail-cluster tier-scoring methodology, but that slug resolves to a real, unrelated article about data-center FACILITY co-location siting. No article for the real retail methodology existed under any slug, and the one place a scoring mechanism WAS described in detail (app-orchestration-gis.md) described a Haversine formula the real SCORING-METHODOLOGY.md V3 confirms was replaced by a 4-tier gate system — with 2 more articles describing the mechanism differently again, none matching each other or reality. Created substrate/retail-co-location-tier-methodology.md as the single source of truth (facts from the verified real methodology doc) and repointed all 7 citing articles (14 files EN+ES) to it. Fixed architecture/_index.md's MOC description, which had also mischaracterized the real co-location-methodology.md article. All content-matrix clusters now resolved.