The Preprint Notice

@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
---
schema: foundry-doc-v1
title: "The Preprint Notice"
slug: preprint-notice-convention
category: research
type: reference
content_type: topic
quality: complete
short_description: "What the mandatory preprint notice on every research paper means: a working draft, not yet peer-reviewed, subject to revision, and not a final or authoritative account."
status: active
bcsc_class: public-disclosure-safe
last_edited: 2026-07-03
editor: pointsav-engineering
paired_with: preprint-notice-convention.es.md
cites: []
---

Every paper published in this category carries a preprint notice. This article explains
what that notice means, why the research programme publishes this way, and what a reader
should and should not conclude from a paper that carries one.

## What a preprint is

A preprint is a working draft of a research paper made public before it has completed
formal peer review. The term is standard practice across academic and applied research —
physics, economics, and computer science all maintain large public preprint archives —
and it carries a specific, limited meaning: the analysis, methodology, and conclusions in
the paper are the authors' current position, offered for reading and scrutiny, but they
have not yet been independently reviewed and accepted by an editorial board or a panel of
outside referees. A preprint is not unfinished in the sense of being incomplete; it is a
complete argument, argued end to end. What it lacks is external validation of that
argument by a third party with no stake in the outcome.

## Why papers in this category are published this way

The alternative to publishing as a preprint is to hold a paper back until a formal
peer-review cycle completes — a process that can take months or years, and that in
academic and industry practice often runs in parallel with, rather than before, public
circulation of the working draft. This research programme publishes as it produces: a
paper that is complete and internally reviewed is made available immediately, under the
preprint notice, rather than withheld while an external review process — which may or may
not ever occur for a given paper — proceeds separately. This keeps the published record
honest about its own status rather than presenting a working draft as more final than it
is.

## What the notice does and does not claim

The preprint notice makes one claim and declines several others. It claims that the paper
is a genuine, complete piece of work that its authors stand behind at the time of
publication. It does not claim that the paper has been peer-reviewed, that its
conclusions are final, or that later revisions will not supersede it. A paper carrying
the notice may be revised, corrected, or withdrawn as errors are found or as the
underlying subject develops — a preprint is a snapshot of the authors' current
understanding, not a permanent record in the way a signed contract or an audited filing
is.

## What this means for a reader

A reader citing or relying on a paper in this category should treat it the way any
preprint is conventionally treated elsewhere: as a serious, complete piece of analysis
that has not yet cleared independent review. Where a claim in a preprint matters for a
decision, the appropriate diligence is the same diligence any preprint warrants —
checking the paper's own citations and methodology rather than treating publication here
as equivalent to peer-reviewed acceptance. This is the same discipline applied to every
other paper in this category, and it is why the notice is mandatory rather than optional:
it is the honest description of what publication in this category does, and does not,
represent.

## See also

- [[research]] — the research category landing page and current paper list