Skip to content

PointSav Documentation

The engineering library for the PointSav platform — operating systems and services for regulated businesses that own their data, their AI, and their record-keeping outright. Where the monorepo holds the code, this wiki holds the reasoning: architecture, services, security, and the governance commitments that bind future development.

Fleet aggregator

← All revisions

3daa0bd3 · PointSav Digital Systems ·

fix(os-orchestration): remove fabricated PSP claim, fix revenue misattribution, re-hedge to planned

View the full record as of this revision →

@@ -10,62 +10,62 @@ status: active
audience: vendor-public
bcsc_class: public-disclosure-safe
language_protocol: PROSE-TOPIC
last_edited: 2026-05-15
last_edited: 2026-08-03
editor: pointsav-engineering
paired_with: os-orchestration.es.md
short_description: "os-orchestration is the commercial-tier OS letting a single operator see, query, and command many Totebox archives at once — the Fleet Aggregator for enterprise deployments."
cites: []
---

**Correction revised, 2026-08-02.** An earlier pass said "no crate named `os-orchestration` exists in the monorepo today" — checked against this archive's stale local branch. On canonical (`origin/main`), `os-orchestration/` is a real, registered crate (own `Cargo.toml`, `license = "FSL-1.1-ALv2"`), but its `src/lib.rs` is a 4-line placeholder ("SYSTEM EVENT: os-orchestration scaffold verified.") — no aggregation logic. The rename from `os-interface` is confirmed in-progress on canonical too (root `LICENSE`: "os-interface/ — interface module (renames to os-orchestration)"). The "PSP" (PointSav Protocol) claim remains confirmed fabricated — re-checked directly against `origin/main`, zero code footprint anywhere. Net effect: the substantive finding is unchanged (this article's described functionality isn't built) but "the crate doesn't exist" was the wrong framing — it exists as an empty scaffold, same as many other placeholder crates found this session. **Flagged, not resolved** — needs re-hedging to planned/intended language throughout.
**Correction revised, 2026-08-02.** An earlier pass said "no crate named `os-orchestration` exists in the monorepo today" — checked against this archive's stale local branch. On canonical (`origin/main`), `os-orchestration/` is a real, registered crate (own `Cargo.toml`, `license = "FSL-1.1-ALv2"`), but its `src/lib.rs` is a 4-line placeholder ("SYSTEM EVENT: os-orchestration scaffold verified.") — no aggregation logic. The rename from `os-interface` is confirmed in-progress on canonical too (root `LICENSE`: "os-interface/ — interface module (renames to os-orchestration)"). The "PSP" (PointSav Protocol) claim was confirmed fabricated — re-checked directly against `origin/main`, zero code footprint anywhere — and has been removed below (2026-08-03); the aggregation-protocol description is now hedged as planned/intended with no invented protocol name. Net effect: the substantive finding is unchanged (this article's described functionality isn't built) but "the crate doesn't exist" was the wrong framing — it exists as an empty scaffold, same as many other placeholder crates found this session. The rest of the article has also been re-hedged to planned/intended language throughout (2026-08-03) — the "Proprietary" licence claim in the table below is kept as confirmed current fact, since the `LICENSE` file classification applies today even though the aggregation code does not yet exist.

`os-orchestration` is the commercial-tier operating system that lets a single operator see, query, and command many [[totebox-archive|Totebox archives]] at once. Where [[console-os|`os-console`]] connects to one [[totebox-os|`os-totebox`]], `os-orchestration` is the hub between an operator's Console and a fleet of Toteboxes. It is what an executive views when they want the position of every property in a portfolio, every entity in a holding company, or every project in a development pipeline — a single unified answer to "what is the state of the entire estate, right now?" This article covers what `os-orchestration` does, what it deliberately does not do, how aggregation works, the commercial features it adds, and when to deploy it.
`os-orchestration` is planned as the commercial-tier operating system intended to let a single operator see, query, and command many [[totebox-archive|Totebox archives]] at once. Where [[console-os|`os-console`]] connects to one [[totebox-os|`os-totebox`]], `os-orchestration` is intended as the hub between an operator's Console and a fleet of Toteboxes — what an executive would view to see the position of every property in a portfolio, every entity in a holding company, or every project in a development pipeline, in a single unified answer to "what is the state of the entire estate, right now?" This article covers the intended design: what `os-orchestration` is planned to do, what it is designed to deliberately not do, how aggregation is intended to work, the commercial features planned for it, and when it would be deployed. **None of this is built yet** — see the correction above.

## What it does not do
## What it is designed not to do

`os-orchestration` does not store raw records. It is stateless. It pulls metadata from Toteboxes, synthesises a unified view, and presents it through `os-console`. Raw data never leaves its sovereign Totebox. The aggregator sees only what the Totebox is permitted to expose.
`os-orchestration` is designed not to store raw records — to be stateless. The intent is that it would pull metadata from Toteboxes, synthesise a unified view, and present it through `os-console`, with raw data never leaving its Totebox. Under this design the aggregator would see only what the Totebox is permitted to expose.

This boundary is structurally important: even if `os-orchestration` is compromised, the underlying Toteboxes remain sealed. The aggregator holds no keys to the archives.
This boundary is intended to be structurally important: even if `os-orchestration` were compromised, the underlying Toteboxes would remain sealed, since the aggregator is not meant to hold keys to the archives.

## Where it sits in the product line
## Where it is planned to sit in the product line

| Component | Role | Licence model (planned) |
|---|---|---|
| `os-console` | Operator-facing terminal | AGPL-3.0-or-later source; free BETA today |
| `os-totebox` | Data archive per entity | FSL-1.1-ALv2 source-available now; converts to Apache-2.0 after 2 years; free BETA today |
| `os-orchestration` | Fleet aggregator | Proprietary (intended as a commercial product) |
| `os-orchestration` | Fleet aggregator (planned) | Proprietary — confirmed via the monorepo `LICENSE` file today, ahead of the aggregation logic itself |

The commercial line is drawn at the aggregator. The Console and the Totebox are intended to be free and freely transferable. The Orchestration aggregator is the paid product — an individual operator managing one entity never needs it.
The commercial line is intended to be drawn at the aggregator. The Console and the Totebox are intended to be free and freely transferable. The Orchestration aggregator is planned as the paid product — an individual operator managing one entity would never need it.

## How aggregation works
## How aggregation is intended to work

`os-orchestration` connects to Toteboxes through the PointSav Protocol (PSP) — a [[capability-based-security|capability-based]] binary protocol that tunnels through standard TLS at the edge. Inside the tunnel:
The design intent is for `os-orchestration` to connect to Toteboxes through a [[capability-based-security|capability-based]] protocol tunnelled through standard TLS at the edge — no specific protocol name is committed to code today. Inside the tunnel, the intended flow is:

1. The aggregator sends a signed capability object granting permission to read a specific row of a specific Totebox for a fixed time window.
2. The Totebox verifies the capability, runs the query internally, and emits only the result — never the raw record.
3. The aggregator combines results from many Toteboxes into a single unified view.
1. The aggregator would send a signed capability object granting permission to read a specific row of a specific Totebox for a fixed time window.
2. The Totebox would verify the capability, run the query internally, and emit only the result — never the raw record.
3. The aggregator would combine results from many Toteboxes into a single unified view.

Promise pipelining and zero-copy memory mapping make the experience feel local even when Toteboxes are distributed across multiple regions.
If built as designed, promise pipelining and zero-copy memory mapping are intended to make the experience feel local even when Toteboxes are distributed across multiple regions.

## The commercial features
## The commercial features (planned)

Three capabilities are reserved exclusively to `os-orchestration`:
Three capabilities are planned to be reserved exclusively to `os-orchestration`:

| Feature | What it enables |
| Feature | What it is intended to enable |
|---|---|
| Aggregation | Reading metadata from multiple Toteboxes simultaneously |
| Multi-tenancy | Serving multiple operators against the same underlying fleet |
| Complex viewports | Cross-archive dashboards — portfolio rollups, cross-entity reconciliation, executive summaries |

These features are intentionally absent from the open `os-console` codebase. They live in the `os-orchestration` codebase and nowhere else.
These features are intended to be intentionally absent from the open `os-console` codebase — planned to live in the `os-orchestration` codebase and nowhere else, once built.

## The Diode discipline
## The Diode discipline (planned)

`os-orchestration` can issue commands downstream to the Toteboxes it manages. The Toteboxes cannot issue commands back up. The aggregator is itself a [[diode-standard|Diode]] subject: it receives commands only from `os-console`, never from a Totebox. This makes lateral movement structurally impossible — a compromised Totebox cannot use the aggregator as a bridge to the operator's Console. The [[totebox-orchestration|Totebox Orchestration]] article covers the coordination layer's provisioning and lifecycle management.
The design calls for `os-orchestration` to be able to issue commands downstream to the Toteboxes it manages, with Toteboxes unable to issue commands back up. The aggregator is intended to itself be a [[diode-standard|Diode]] subject: receiving commands only from `os-console`, never from a Totebox. This is designed to make lateral movement structurally impossible — a compromised Totebox would not be able to use the aggregator as a bridge to the operator's Console. The [[totebox-orchestration|Totebox Orchestration]] article covers the coordination layer's provisioning and lifecycle management.

## When to deploy
## When it would be deployed

`os-orchestration` is a commercial product for multi-entity operators. Single-entity operators managing one Totebox do not need it. Multi-entity operators — real-estate portfolios, public companies with subsidiaries, family offices with multiple holdings — deploy it when the cognitive load of running separate Consoles against individual Toteboxes justifies the aggregator.
`os-orchestration` is planned as a commercial product for multi-entity operators. Single-entity operators managing one Totebox would not need it. Multi-entity operators — real-estate portfolios, public companies with subsidiaries, family offices with multiple holdings — would be the intended customer once the cognitive load of running separate Consoles against individual Toteboxes justifies the aggregator.

## See also

Important Information

Corporate structure. PointSav Digital Systems ("PointSav") is currently a trade name of Woodfine Capital Projects Inc. ("Woodfine"), planned to become a wholly-owned Woodfine subsidiary upon incorporation. PointSav does not itself offer, sell, or solicit any security. Any securities offering associated with Woodfine's real-property direct-hold solutions is made exclusively by Woodfine, and only by means of the applicable Private Placement Memorandum.

No investment advice. This wiki's content is provided for engineering, operational, research, and development purposes. Nothing on this wiki constitutes investment advice or a solicitation to invest in any Woodfine partnership or direct-hold solution.

Intellectual property. The PointSav name, trade name, wordmark, and marks, together with all current and future PointSav- and Totebox-branded products, services, and offerings — and the software, source code, documentation, design system, and all related materials — are proprietary to Woodfine and its affiliates, except for components identified as open source. No rights are granted except as expressly set out in a written license or agreement. The full trademark notice appears in the footer of every page on this site.

Open source components. Portions of the platform are made available under permissive open-source licenses identified in the accompanying repository. Use of those components is governed by their respective license terms.

No warranty; informational use. Content on this wiki is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute a representation, warranty, or commitment with respect to product functionality, availability, pricing, or roadmap. Some articles describe planned or intended features, capabilities, and milestones — language such as "planned," "intended," "targeted," "may," and "expected" marks this forward-looking content, which is subject to change and does not constitute a commitment regarding future performance.

Confidentiality. Where an article describes an operational or deployment detail that is not intended for public disclosure, that article is not published on this wiki. Content here is general-purpose engineering documentation, not customer-specific configuration.

Jurisdiction. Woodfine Capital Projects Inc. is organized in British Columbia, Canada. References to the Sovereign Data Foundation on this wiki describe a planned or intended initiative only, not a current equity holder or active governance body.

Changes to this notice. PointSav may update this notice from time to time; the version posted on this page governs.

Not a filing system. This wiki is not a securities filing system, an electronic disclosure repository, or a substitute for SEDAR+ or any other regulatory filing system. Formal securities filings are made through the applicable regulatory filing system, not through this wiki.

Full disclaimer. This notice supplements, and does not replace, the full Disclaimers article. In the event of any conflict, the full Disclaimers article governs.

Read the full disclaimer →