Legal and IP structure
editorial(governance): fix legal-and-ip-structure license table to the real ratified per-directory scheme (Track-B) — de-narrated the stale 2026-08-02 correction, verified directly against root LICENSE v1.2: os-totebox is FSL not AGPL (os-console/os-workplace are AGPL, contradicting the article's uniform-tier grouping), os-orchestration is a distinct PointSav-ARR proprietary tier not generic Proprietary, confirmed zero Sovereign Addendum concept anywhere in the license text, confirmed service-pointsav-link does not exist as a crate; ES pair had never been corrected at all (still silently presented the stale table as fact) — fixed to match; register-clean EN+ES
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ status: active audience: vendor-public bcsc_class: public-disclosure-safe language_protocol: PROSE-TOPIC last_edited: 2026-05-15 last_edited: 2026-08-22 editor: pointsav-engineering paired_with: legal-and-ip-structure.es.md cites: @@ -77,19 +77,20 @@ Canadian regulatory practice distinguishes between roles with fiduciary authorit Strategic and fiduciary decisions are escalated outside the routine contributor tier; the system administrator is the only identity with cross-org write access to canonical repositories. ## License strategy (intended) ## License strategy The intended licensing pattern follows an open-core model. All licensing targets are planned and subject to the [[bcsc-disclosure-posture|BCSC continuous-disclosure posture]] [ni-51-102] [osc-sn-51-721]: Licensing follows an open-core model, ratified and assigned at the directory level (root `LICENSE`, "MULTI-LICENSE NOTICE" v1.2, effective 2026-08-02): **Correction (2026-08-02):** this table is now stale, not fabricated — it predates (last-edited 2026-05-15) the real licensing policy that was ratified and propagated repo-wide on 2026-05-24 (root `LICENSE`, "MULTI-LICENSE NOTICE" v1.1). The "planned" outcome landed differently than predicted: `os-totebox`, `os-console`, and `os-workplace` are already **AGPL-3.0-or-later**, not "Apache 2.0 + Sovereign Addendum" — there is no separate "Sovereign Addendum" concept anywhere in the real license text. `os-orchestration`'s real license (per its own `Cargo.toml` on canonical) is `FSL-1.1-ALv2`, inherited from its `os-interface` rename-predecessor, not a standalone "Proprietary" tier. `service-pointsav-link` is confirmed absent from the codebase — checked on canonical too, not just this archive's local checkout. **Flagged, not resolved** — needs updating to the real, already-ratified per-directory scheme rather than a still-future "planned" framing. | Tier | Coverage | Represents | |---|---|---| | AGPL-3.0-or-later | The platform default — `os-console`, `os-workplace`, all `service-*`/`system-*`/`tool-*` (except `tool-wallet`), most `moonshot-*` directories, `app-console-*`, `app-workplace-*`, and workspace tooling | The open core | | FSL-1.1-ALv2 | `os-totebox`, `os-infrastructure`, `os-privategit`, `os-mediakit`, `os-network-admin`, their `app-*` extensions, and 5 named `moonshot-*` overrides | A source-available tier that converts to Apache-2.0 on a future date | | Apache-2.0 | `tool-wallet` only | A deliberate override — no revenue role, seeds the open-source binary shelf | | PointSav-ARR (proprietary) | `os-orchestration` (the `os-interface` rename target) and `app-orchestration-*` | The commercial moat — not distributed under either open tier | | Component | Planned licence | |---|---| | `os-totebox`, `os-console`, `os-workplace` (open core) | Apache 2.0 + Sovereign Addendum (planned) | | `os-orchestration` (commercial aggregator) | Proprietary (planned) | | `service-pointsav-link` (the [[diode-standard|Diode]] adapter) | Proprietary, sold as an enterprise add-on (planned) | `os-totebox` is FSL-licensed; `os-console` and `os-workplace` are AGPL — the three components carry two different licenses, not one uniform "open core" tier. No "Sovereign Addendum" license extension exists anywhere in the real license text — the running-instance-portability property described below is a design goal, not a distinct license grant. `service-pointsav-link`, the [[diode-standard|Diode]] enforcement adapter, does not exist as a crate in the codebase, so it carries no license assignment. The Sovereign Addendum is the planned licence extension intended to guarantee that the running instance — not just the source code — remains the user's property and is freely transferable between hardware substrates. The pattern follows the open-core model: open core attracts adoption; proprietary services produce revenue. The pattern follows the open-core model: the AGPL/FSL tiers attract adoption; the PointSav-ARR tier produces revenue. ## Patent strategy (intended)