Skip to content

Three-tier contributor model

← All revisions

21698227 · PointSav Digital Systems ·

enrich wikilinks: documentation governance body (EN+ES) batch 1

View the full record as of this revision →

@@ -30,13 +30,13 @@ The PointSav platform is too broad for any single team to maintain and too valua

The Core tier owns workspace documents, doctrine amendments, conventions, and the citations registry. Architectural decisions flow through this tier. Apprentice-mode oversight — the senior review function in the apprenticeship substrate — for new model versions and new contributors lives here.

This tier is small by design. Three architectural primitives keep it tractable: the substrate is operationally self-sufficient enough that customer breakouts do not require Core handholding; the Trajectory Substrate makes the substrate self-documenting; and the Adapter Composition Algebra makes operational personality composable rather than person-dependent.
This tier is small by design. Three architectural primitives keep it tractable: the substrate is operationally self-sufficient enough that customer breakouts do not require Core handholding; the [[trajectory-substrate|Trajectory Substrate]] makes the substrate self-documenting; and the [[adapter-composition|Adapter Composition Algebra]] makes operational personality composable rather than person-dependent.

### Paid

Project-tier engineering work, paid by PointSav, executed via GitHub pull requests against the public substrate repositories. Engineering work in `pointsav-monorepo/` and the per-project cluster paths. Multi-tenant aggregation services. Per-jurisdiction export adapters. LoRA adapter authoring. Customer-specific deployment provisioning and integration.

The 50–100 band is the size where individual contributor reputation can be tracked through the Trajectory Substrate's attribution, per-deliverable contracting is tractable without enterprise procurement bureaucracy, and revenue from multi-tenant aggregation services can sustain the headcount without venture-scale capital.
The 50–100 band is the size where individual contributor reputation can be tracked through the [[trajectory-substrate|Trajectory Substrate's attribution]], per-deliverable contracting is tractable without enterprise procurement bureaucracy, and revenue from multi-tenant aggregation services can sustain the headcount without venture-scale capital.

### Open

@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ The Open tier is what makes the substrate self-sustaining at a scale that 4–7 

The model is not caste-bound. Three mobility paths operate:

- **Open to Paid.** A contributor whose recurring work shows operational quality is offered Paid contracts. Reputation derives from the Trajectory Substrate's attribution — how much each contributor's work shapes downstream recommendations.
- **Open to Paid.** A contributor whose recurring work shows operational quality is offered Paid contracts. Reputation derives from the [[apprenticeship-substrate|Trajectory Substrate's attribution]] — how much each contributor's work shapes downstream recommendations.
- **Paid to Core.** Rare; requires alignment with PointSav's long-term substrate stewardship and senior operational trust.
- **Anyone can fork, leave, and operate their own substrate.** The Designed-for-Breakout property applies at the contributor level: a contributor can take their work, their adapters, and their tenant data and operate independently. The substrate does not lock contributors any more than it locks customers.

@@ -62,9 +62,9 @@ Naïve calculation: 4–7 employees plus 50–100 contractors plus 10,000-plus o

Three architectural primitives make it real:

1. The Trajectory Substrate makes contributor reputation cryptographically attributable, so Open-tier reputation can compound into Paid-tier eligibility without procurement bureaucracy.
2. The Adapter Composition Algebra lets individual contributors ship adapters without owning the whole substrate.
3. The Designed-for-Breakout property keeps the contributor relationship voluntary — no contributor is locked in, which means contributors participate because the substrate serves their interests, not because they cannot leave.
1. The [[trajectory-substrate|Trajectory Substrate]] makes contributor reputation cryptographically attributable, so Open-tier reputation can compound into Paid-tier eligibility without procurement bureaucracy.
2. The [[adapter-composition|Adapter Composition Algebra]] lets individual contributors ship adapters without owning the whole substrate.
3. The [[customer-hostability|Designed-for-Breakout]] property keeps the contributor relationship voluntary — no contributor is locked in, which means contributors participate because the substrate serves their interests, not because they cannot leave.

## Forward-looking — scaling the Open tier

@@ -82,7 +82,8 @@ It is not a venture-scale labour model. The 50–100 Paid tier sustains on multi

## See also

- [[compounding-substrate]]
- [[apprenticeship-substrate]]
- [[customer-hostability]]
- [[canadian-simple-copyright]]
- [[compounding-substrate]] — the substrate architecture that open contributors extend and improve
- [[apprenticeship-substrate]] — corpus capture and attribution pipeline that tracks contributor reputation
- [[trajectory-substrate]] — cryptographic attribution substrate that makes Open-to-Paid mobility tractable
- [[customer-hostability]] — the breakout property that keeps contributor participation voluntary
- [[canadian-simple-copyright]] — IP ownership posture governing work produced under the Paid and Core tiers
Important Information

Important Information

Corporate structure. PointSav Digital Systems ("PointSav") is a trade name of Woodfine Capital Projects Inc. ("Woodfine"). PointSav does not itself offer, sell, or solicit any security. Any securities offering associated with Woodfine's real-property direct-hold solutions is made exclusively by Woodfine, and only by means of the applicable Private Placement Memorandum.

No investment advice. This wiki's content is provided for engineering, operational, research, and development purposes. Nothing on this wiki constitutes investment advice or a solicitation to invest in any Woodfine partnership or direct-hold solution.

Intellectual property. The PointSav name, trade name, wordmark, and marks, together with all current and future PointSav- and Totebox-branded products, services, and offerings — and the software, source code, documentation, design system, and all related materials — are proprietary to Woodfine and its affiliates, except for components identified as open source. No rights are granted except as expressly set out in a written license or agreement. See TRADEMARK.md in this repository for the full trademark notice.

Open source components. Portions of the platform are made available under permissive open-source licenses identified in the accompanying repository. Use of those components is governed by their respective license terms.

No warranty; informational use. Content on this wiki is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute a representation, warranty, or commitment with respect to product functionality, availability, pricing, or roadmap. Some articles describe planned or intended features, capabilities, and milestones — language such as "planned," "intended," "targeted," "may," and "expected" marks this forward-looking content, which is subject to change and does not constitute a commitment regarding future performance.

Confidentiality. Where an article describes an operational or deployment detail that is not intended for public disclosure, that article is not published on this wiki. Content here is general-purpose engineering documentation, not customer-specific configuration.

Jurisdiction. Woodfine Capital Projects Inc. is organized in British Columbia, Canada. References to the Sovereign Data Foundation on this wiki describe a planned or intended initiative only, not a current equity holder or active governance body.

Changes to this notice. PointSav may update this notice from time to time; the version posted on this page governs.

Not a filing system. This wiki is not a securities filing system, an electronic disclosure repository, or a substitute for SEDAR+ or any other regulatory filing system. Formal securities filings are made through the applicable regulatory filing system, not through this wiki.

Full disclaimer. This notice supplements, and does not replace, the full Disclaimers article. In the event of any conflict, the full Disclaimers article governs.

Read the full disclaimer →