Citation substrate
docs(documentation): rename fabricated osc-sn-51-721 citation ID to np-51-201 workspace-wide -- following Command's citations.yaml fix (commit c6be400, real workspace-wide OSC SN 51-721 sweep), this wiki's citation ID and ~59 prose/frontmatter references to the fabricated Ontario-specific staff notice were left dangling; renamed to the real CSA National Policy 51-201 entry Command's fix established, matching the same instrument corporate wiki's dad5b0a fix now cites. Mechanical ID rename + prose phrase swap only, no new claims (EN+ES, 61 files).
@@ -10,11 +10,11 @@ index_group: core-named-substrates short_description: "Platform-wide YAML citation registry with drift detection that makes provenance machine-auditable from regulatory instrument to published claim." status: active bcsc_class: public-disclosure-safe last_edited: 2026-05-15 last_edited: 2026-08-24 editor: pointsav-engineering cites: - ni-51-102 - osc-sn-51-721 - np-51-201 - cff-spec - cff-github - turing-way-cff @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ The registry holds 159 entries covering regulatory instruments (NI 51-102, SEC R Three components work together: a central registry holding one entry per citation ID; per-document `cites:` front-matter that makes dependencies machine-readable; and inline `[id]` syntax in body prose that marks each reference with its registry-resolvable ID. A nightly automated pass fetches each registered URL, verifies the content hash, and surfaces material changes or link rot for human review before they propagate into published content or training data. For regulated buyers, this means every claim about compliance properties — record immutability, AI audit trails, data residency — carries a traceable stated basis. A compliance officer auditing documentation about SEC Rule 17a-4(f) can follow the citation to the primary regulatory instrument without accessing internal systems. This satisfies the "stated basis" requirement under `[ni-51-102]` and `[osc-sn-51-721]` for forward-looking information in [[disclosure-substrate|public-facing content]]. For regulated buyers, this means every claim about compliance properties — record immutability, AI audit trails, data residency — carries a traceable stated basis. A compliance officer auditing documentation about SEC Rule 17a-4(f) can follow the citation to the primary regulatory instrument without accessing internal systems. This satisfies the "stated basis" requirement under `[ni-51-102]` and `[np-51-201]` for forward-looking information in [[disclosure-substrate|public-facing content]]. ## Overview @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ Three components constitute the Citation Substrate: document_version: 0.0.2 cites: - ni-51-102 - osc-sn-51-721 - np-51-201 --- ``` @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ Adding a new citation follows the seeding principle: the registry entry and the Three reasons drive the discipline, not one. **Regulatory traceability.** Per `[ni-51-102]` and `[osc-sn-51-721]`, forward-looking information in public-facing content must carry cautionary language, a stated basis, and material assumptions. The citation graph makes "stated basis" machine-auditable: a reviewer can walk from a public-facing claim back to the regulatory instrument or research paper that grounds it. Without per-claim citations, the walk is manual and incomplete. **Regulatory traceability.** Per `[ni-51-102]` and `[np-51-201]`, forward-looking information in public-facing content must carry cautionary language, a stated basis, and material assumptions. The citation graph makes "stated basis" machine-auditable: a reviewer can walk from a public-facing claim back to the regulatory instrument or research paper that grounds it. Without per-claim citations, the walk is manual and incomplete. **Drift prevention.** The corpus grows across sessions, contributors, and years. Two documents citing the same authority can make divergent claims about what it says — divergent-claim pairs on primary sources are the primary failure mode of large knowledge corpora. The nightly hygiene pass's drift-detection step finds exactly these pairs and surfaces them as review items before they propagate into training data or public publication.